https://xn----7sbbsoldvdiem2a5e1c.xn--p1ai/viewtopic.php?id=15976 Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:18:09 +0000 PunBB https://xn----7sbbsoldvdiem2a5e1c.xn--p1ai/viewtopic.php?pid=59309#p59309 I am preparing a small set of Suno stems for a community project, and the last export left faint clicks and metallic tails between phrases. The tracks are usable, yet those details become distracting on headphones. I do not need a dramatic remake; I want careful cleanup that preserves timing and the character of the vocals. While comparing practical options, I found this audio-repair reference. It gave me a starting point, but I would value advice from people who have tested similar tools. I am trying to decide whether selective repair belongs before or after a light EQ pass. My first concern is retaining believable vocal detail. A separate test render seems useful. I can compare a few sections without changing the whole track. The repair should remain gentle. Any processed layer must align smoothly with the original. I also need simple settings for later revisions. A small listening session may reveal more than meters alone. The final mix should still feel warm. The chosen steps must be safe to document. I will also listen at moderate volume. I would rather leave a minor flaw than create a new one. Has anyone found a dependable order for this kind of selective repair? I am grateful for thoughtful suggestions.

]]> Mon, 14 Sep 2026 11:18:09 +0000 https://xn----7sbbsoldvdiem2a5e1c.xn--p1ai/viewtopic.php?pid=59309#p59309